No topic is debated as passionately in Germany as immigration. Since the recent state elections in East Germany the intensity of the discussion has increased further. Both the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) and the left-conservative BSW have succeeded in stoking fears of cultural identity loss and advocate for a "raise the drawbridge" policy, essentially calling for the strictest possible immigration controls. I am astonished at how the hitherto fruitless attempts of established parties to engage in factbased discussions are unfolding. I can't rid myself of the feeling that not everyone is genuinely interested in finding solutions, but rather in keeping the problem simmering until the federal elections next year. How one might believe this could possibly curb the seemingly inexorable rise of populist parties is beyond me.
Social integration often fails
But that's not the main point here. What concerns me, and what is discussed far less, are the deficits in the social integration of foreign nationals already in Germany. When it comes to integrating into the job market and schools, Germany can learn a lot from its neighboring countries.
Many could work but aren't allowed to
Particularly at the beginning of their stay, various institutional hurdles like asylum procedures, employment bans, and residency requirements hinder the labor market integration of refugees. Often, authorities and chambers do not recognize foreign professional qualifications: only 30% of refugees with a university degree in Germany work in jobs that match their qualifications. By the end of 2023, only about 25% of Ukrainian refugees of working age were employed in Germany. For the Netherlands, Denmark, or Poland, the figures are around 40%, and for the UK close to 55%.
Ukrainian refugees are by and large well educated. Yet, in 2023, more than half of the Ukrainian participants did not pass integration courses successfully, either failing the final exams or dropping out early. Language barriers remain the biggest obstacle. The Federal Audit Office in Germany rightly calls the results "sobering." For those who fled to Germany between 2015 and 2019, language support has already proven to be a crucial factor. Eight years after arrival, the employment rate is still only two-thirds.
Employment ratio of refugees by years of residence (18-64 years)
⬤ {series.name}: {point.y}
Children of immigrants lag behind in school
Lack of German language skills also seems to result in children with immigrant backgrounds performing particularly poorly in international comparisons. “Immigrant students in Germany have lower reading proficiency compared to most other European destination countries,” according to a recent OECD report on the state of immigrant integration. And the trend has been clearly negative since the refugee crisis began in 2015. Investing in education and giving the weakest a head start pays off over decades, as experience shows. Also for society at large!
Average points at PISA Maths Test 2022
OECD average for immigrant children: 435
What needs to change now
Unsatisfactory integration is not only economically damaging, given that there is a significant need for workers. It also has devastating effects on social cohesion, as recent election results demonstrate. It is in Germany's best interest to turn the integration of those who are here and are likely to stay into a success story. This requires a rapid reduction of bureaucratic obstacles and more integration offers. Yes, this will require some taxpayer money. But failed integration of hundreds of thousands of people will be financially and socially far more costly.
Diese Publikation richtet sich ausschließlich an Empfänger in der EU, Schweiz und in Liechtenstein. Diese Publikation wird von der LBBW nicht an Personen in den USA vertrieben und die LBBW beab- sichtigt nicht, Personen in den USA anzusprechen. Aufsichtsbehörden der LBBW: Europäische Zentralbank (EZB), Sonnemannstraße 22, 60314 Frankfurt am Main und Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin), Graurheindorfer Str. 108, 53117 Bonn / Marie-Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt. Diese Publikation beruht auf von uns nicht überprüfbaren, allgemein zugänglichen Quellen, die wir für zuverlässig halten, für deren Richtigkeit und Vollständigkeit wir jedoch keine Gewähr übernehmen kön- nen. Sie gibt unsere unverbindliche Auffassung über den Markt und die Produkte zum Zeitpunkt des Redaktionsschlusses wieder, ungeachtet etwaiger Eigenbestände in diesen Produkten. Diese Publika- tion ersetzt nicht die persönliche Beratung. Sie dient nur Informationszwecken und gilt nicht als Angebot oder Aufforderung zum Kauf oder Verkauf. Für weitere zeitnähere Informationen über konkrete Anlage- möglichkeiten und zum Zwecke einer individuellen Anlageberatung wenden Sie sich bitte an Ihren An- lageberater. Wir behalten uns vor, unsere hier geäußerte Meinung jederzeit und ohne Vorankündigung zu ändern. Wir behalten uns des Weiteren vor, ohne weitere Vorankündigung Aktualisierungen die- ser Information nicht vorzunehmen oder völlig einzustellen. Die in dieser Ausarbeitung abgebildeten oder beschriebenen früheren Wertentwicklungen, Simulatio- nen oder Prognosen stellen keinen verlässlichen Indikator für die künftige Wertentwicklung dar. Die Entgegennahme von Research Dienstleistungen durch ein Wertpapierdienstleistungsunternehmen kann aufsichtsrechtlich als Zuwendung qualifiziert werden. In diesen Fällen geht die LBBW davon aus, dass die Zuwendung dazu bestimmt ist, die Qualität der jeweiligen Dienstleistung für den Kunden des Zuwendungsempfängers zu verbessern.